Galder, the CacheManager.getUserTransaction() javadoc says the method should return "a" UserTransaction. It doesn't mandate any connection with any active TM, in fact based on this issue I think Ehcache will always return their own UserTransaction object: https://github.com/jsr107/jsr107spec/issues/28
The Javadoc of the methods in UserTransaction and in TransactionManager in the standard are identical. So if they don't behave the same, that's a bug in the TM. Case in point, I just looked at JBossTS version 4.16.3 and UserTransactionImple doesn't do anything except extend BaseTransaction. TransactionManagerImple also extends BaseTransaction and adds a few extra methods. BaseTransaction doesn't have any instance state (it's all statics and thread locals), so UserTransactionImple and TransactionManagerImple are identical except for the extra methods in TransactionManagerImple. Cheers Dan On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Galder Zamarreño <gal...@redhat.com> wrote: > I'm no transactions expert, but I did consider that and I highly doubt > it's that simple. > > Even if it might probably just work, you'll never be able to guarantee > that such UserTransaction behaves just like You-Fav-JTATM-UserTransaction > without throrough testing. > > Go to your IDE (dunno where JBoss TS source code is online…) and open up: > - com.arjuna.ats.internal.jta.transaction.arjunacore.UserTransactionImple > - com.arjuna.ats.internal.jta.transaction.arjunacore.BaseTransaction > > Cheers, > > On Feb 7, 2013, at 2:17 PM, Dan Berindei <dan.berin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Do we really need to expose the TransactionManager's UserTransaction > implementation? > > > > Looking at the interface, it seems like a subset of TransactionManager, > so couldn't we return a custom UserTransaction that just delegates to the > TransactionManager? > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Manik Surtani <msurt...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > Ok. Then a separate Lookup is what we'd need, I guess. Not pretty, but > oh well. > > > > On 7 Feb 2013, at 11:41, Galder Zamarreño <gal...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Feb 7, 2013, at 12:31 PM, Manik Surtani <msurt...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> On 7 Feb 2013, at 11:23, Galder Zamarreño <gal...@redhat.com> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Hi all, > > >>> > > >>> I'm back with a more food for thought wrt JSR-107 impl. Our > CacheManager adapter needs to implement: > > >>> > > >>> UserTransaction getUserTransaction(); > > >>> > > >>> The problem there is that there's no standard way of getting a > UserTransaction given a JTA TransactionManager. > > >>> > > >>> It really is down to each TransactionManager provider to give a > UserTransaction instance (whether JNDI, static…etc). > > >>> > > >>> So, we need a way to lookup a UserTransaction. > > >>> > > >>> One option is to add a getUserTransaction to > TransactionManagerLookup, but that will break existing clients. > > >> > > >> You mean it would break existing TML implementations? > > > > > > ^ Yeah, potentially yeah. > > > > > >> Do we know of any custom TML implementations though? > > > > > > Yes: > > > - > https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-orm/blob/master/hibernate-infinispan/src/main/java/org/hibernate/cache/infinispan/tm/HibernateTransactionManagerLookup.java > > > - > https://github.com/jbossas/jboss-as/blob/master/clustering/infinispan/src/main/java/org/jboss/as/clustering/infinispan/TransactionManagerProvider.java > > > > > >> > > >>> > > >>> Alternatively, define a > org.infinispan.transaction.lookup.UserTransactionLookup interface which is > configurable. We'd then need to implement for existing TML classes. > > >>> > > >>> If anyone has any other ideas, let us know. > > >>> > > >>> Cheers, > > >>> -- > > >>> Galder Zamarreño > > >>> gal...@redhat.com > > >>> twitter.com/galderz > > >>> > > >>> Project Lead, Escalante > > >>> http://escalante.io > > >>> > > >>> Engineer, Infinispan > > >>> http://infinispan.org > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> _______________________________________________ > > >>> infinispan-dev mailing list > > >>> infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org > > >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Manik Surtani > > >> ma...@jboss.org > > >> twitter.com/maniksurtani > > >> > > >> Platform Architect, JBoss Data Grid > > >> http://red.ht/data-grid > > >> > > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> infinispan-dev mailing list > > >> infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org > > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Galder Zamarreño > > > gal...@redhat.com > > > twitter.com/galderz > > > > > > Project Lead, Escalante > > > http://escalante.io > > > > > > Engineer, Infinispan > > > http://infinispan.org > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > infinispan-dev mailing list > > > infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev > > > > -- > > Manik Surtani > > ma...@jboss.org > > twitter.com/maniksurtani > > > > Platform Architect, JBoss Data Grid > > http://red.ht/data-grid > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > infinispan-dev mailing list > > infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > > infinispan-dev mailing list > > infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev > > > -- > Galder Zamarreño > gal...@redhat.com > twitter.com/galderz > > Project Lead, Escalante > http://escalante.io > > Engineer, Infinispan > http://infinispan.org > > > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev >
_______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
