I'm ok with not having a receive(MessageBatch) method, I don't see any benefit for Infinispan either.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Bela Ban <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm not sure adding receive(MessageBatch) to Receiver and to UpHandler > is a benefit to applications. The current implementation simply calls > receive(Message) or up(new Event(Event.MSG, msg)), so each message in a > batch is delivered in turn. > > I thought - if it turns out we need this - I can always add it later, > .e.g. in 4.0 where API breakage is allowed. > > Thoughts ? I know this is pretty knew, so folks have probably not yet > played with this feature... > > [1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1581 > > -- > Bela Ban, JGroups lead (http://www.jgroups.org) > > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev >
_______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
