On 03/18/2013 01:21 PM, Galder Zamarreño wrote: > Hi all, > > A heads up on what is going on with https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-2281 > > While discussing this, Tristan and I came to the conclusion that we could > avoid the need to create some wrappers required to fulfill requirements in > this JIRA, and as a side effect, reduce the memory consumption of Infinispan > servers, if we could have internal data containers based on concurrent hash > maps that took a custom function for equals/hashCode…etc. By doing that, you > could effectively have **byte[] keys and values for maps**. > > By doing that, you avoid creating wrappers (yippee!) for keys (bye bye > ByteArrayKey), and combined with a better way to pass metadata into > Infinispan Caches (i.e. version) that is stored within the internal cache > entries, you avoid wrapper values too! (bye bye CacheValue). > Pushing this even further would be to keep data and metadata separate in the store representation too as we currently write/read marshalled InternalCacheEntries to the stores. Probably this will have to wait for 6.0 when we overhaul the stores.
Tristan _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
