Why would you need to *store* anything which is equal for all entries? I'd have an interceptor "decorate" stuff with some constant additions; otherwise you could also think of reusing instances, like I had suggested a while back to change the Externalizer contract to allow it to be passed some context to make unique objects taking them from a pool.
At least it looks like you would have to split such metadata: version for example needs to be maintained per entry, as will be vector clocks. Sanne On 20 March 2013 11:04, Tristan Tarrant <[email protected]> wrote: > On 03/20/2013 11:51 AM, Manik Surtani wrote: >> On 18 Mar 2013, at 12:21, Galder Zamarreño <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> IOW, you'll be able to say: create an Infinsipan Server that has String as >>> key and value of type X, where X is the actual data type, no metadata!! The >>> metadata (version, encoding, whatever is requried to fulfill the >>> compatibility reqs in ISPN-2281) will be passed as part of the >>> put/replace…etc (I will email this around when in place). >> Not sure I get this. Where will this metadata be stored? > Metadata should be moved to the ICE-level, or the Cache-level (for > metadata common to all entries in the cache, to save space: e.g. if all > entries in my cache are text/plain) > > Tristan > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
