On 9 May 2013 21:38, Mircea Markus <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 9 May 2013, at 16:03, Sanne Grinovero wrote: > >> On 9 May 2013 15:10, Manik Surtani <[email protected]> wrote: >>> This is something we discussed last year. IIRC we agreed that all cache >>> stores (except the 0-dep FCS) and hot rod clients will move out of the >>> infinispan repo, and have their own repos. They will also have their own >>> release cycles, so will only be released as and when there is a change in >>> their code. >> >> I remember the discussion, but never agreed on it being a good idea. >> I'm not strictly against it, just that I am not understanding the >> point if it, while there are drawbacks. > pros: reduce distribution size, keep build time for the core manageable, > allow a per/cachestore upgrade.
Is that the only advantage? Because the source control should have nothing to do with how the distribution is assembled. I still don't see why it's worth the effort, and the pain. _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
