Fair point... ok, let's leave it as it is now.
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Galder Zamarreño <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Jun 3, 2013, at 11:52 AM, Dan Berindei <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi guys > > > > CacheLoaderInterceptor and DistributionInterceptor both honour the > IGNORE_RETURN_VALUES flag for get commands, but I think it would be more > useful if they ignored it - just like they ignore it for conditional > commands. > > > > That would make it possible for users to only keep a reference to a > cache.getAdvancedCache().withFlags(IGNORE_RETURN_VALUES) and use it for > both read and write operations. > > > > What do you think? > > If I was to take the role of a colleague of the person who's written the > Infinispan code, it'd be very confused to see a cache reference created > with IGNORE_RETURN_VALUES being used for a get() operation… I can see > myself thinking: "Why on earth do you call get with IGNORE_RETURN_VALUES?" > > > > > Cheers > > Dan > > > > _______________________________________________ > > infinispan-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev > > > -- > Galder Zamarreño > [email protected] > twitter.com/galderz > > Project Lead, Escalante > http://escalante.io > > Engineer, Infinispan > http://infinispan.org > > > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev >
_______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
