On 6/4/13 10:44 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>> I think we would hit problems where the JPA EE container/subsystem side >> interacts with the Infinispan (system) module (probably EJB3 code as well.) > > Right, I realize that, but there might be a solution coming we call > "grafting" JGRP-1613 Good you used the conditional tense. I looked into this and I'm currently not convinced this will be needed, or can be added to JGroups. Let's discuss this further at Red Hat Summit next week. > basically it should expose virtually independent channels so that > multiple services > needing an "owned" channel can use them without conflicts, but still sharing > some protocols. So in the specific case of this discussion, people could > reuse the ports, making it easier to configure and possibly faster to > boot, but also > reuse the cluster topology definition and failure detection, making it > less awkward to use as in such > a case you really don't want the topology from the AS to be out of sync with > the > topology used by some application cache. > > Sanne -- Bela Ban, JGroups lead (http://www.jgroups.org) _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
