Thanks, Bela and sorry for my confusing question! Would you say that the bundler_type="new" is more performant than the bundler_type="old" in 3.2.7?
Thanks, Alan ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bela Ban" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2013 10:27:19 AM > Subject: Re: [infinispan-dev] Infinispan 5.3 and the new JGroups bundler > > In 3.2.7, bundler_type="new" is the default. This uses a bundler that's > similar to the new bunder in 3.3.x (which actually started out as a copy > of the 3.2.x bundler). The 3.3.x bundler is more efficient though > > On 6/5/13 4:15 PM, Alan Field wrote: > > Sorry, not sure where I was getting 2.7.x, I meant 3.2.x. (The version > > included with Infinispan 5.2) > > > > Sorry, > > Alan > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Bela Ban" <[email protected]> > >> To: [email protected] > >> Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2013 10:11:34 AM > >> Subject: Re: [infinispan-dev] Infinispan 5.3 and the new JGroups bundler > >> > >> > >> > >> On 6/5/13 3:51 PM, Alan Field wrote: > >>> Hey Pedro, > >>> > >>>>> 1) What is the default bundler used in JGroups 2.7.x? > >>>> > >>>> Bela is the right person to answer this, but I think the new bundler was > >>>> created only in JGroups 3.3.x. > >>> > >>> So what happens if the JGroups 2.7.x config file has > >>> UDP.bundler_type="new"? Will it just be ignored? > >> > >> bundler_type doesn't exist in 2.7, so this will throw an exception and > >> the stack won't be started > > > -- > Bela Ban, JGroups lead (http://www.jgroups.org) > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev > _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
