Sent from my iPhone On 14 Jun 2013, at 20:02, cotton-ben <[email protected]> wrote:
> / >> Just to reiterate, your *never* expects a node to crash? / > > > Easy now, Mircea! > > All of us in the distributed computing community know I'm just trying to help Ben. > that we live in a > world of necessary compromises (i.e. Brewer's CAP theorem, etc.) re: limits > of service guarantees and capabilities. > > Now, of course, I do expect a node to crash. And I do know that such an > event will have consequences for my beloved pinnedKey set. > > But, just as we make compromises because we *definitely* cannot > simultaneously provide CAP (BTW, Prof. Lynch in fact *proved* Brewer's CAP > conjecture) ... it does not mean that we should not 'go for it'. > > The 'P' in CAP is for 'Partition healing' capability of a distributed > system. If my node partition crashes, will just have to evolve a 'healing' > strategy. I will be patient here. I have to be. _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
