----- Original Message ----- | From: "Sanne Grinovero" <sa...@infinispan.org> | To: "infinispan -Dev List" <infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org> | Sent: Thursday, July 4, 2013 3:21:36 PM | Subject: Re: [infinispan-dev] Cachestores performance | | On 4 July 2013 13:56, Manik Surtani <msurt...@redhat.com> wrote: | > Interesting and convoluted thread. I'll try and summarise my thoughts on | > one email: | > | > * I agree with Sanne that a cheat sheet will be extremely useful. Sanne, | > feel like kicking this off with your use case as described here, on the | > wiki? I like your ideas but just ranting about them won't help anybody. | > ;) Maybe then others can follow your template for more use cases, such as | > the one Erik has detailed. | | +1 and sorry for the rant. But still even after all my whining nobody | explained why we want to prioritise synchronous cachestore :-) | My point is not being against doing it, but to identify eagerly what | else is needed to accomodate such a use case: having the CacheStore | implementation is not enough to make such a configuration usable.
There may not be any "we want to" - just my own preference (without proper thought, I admit). But I don't think that it has been *prioritized* beyond the several tests with sync (and there are results for non-sync as well) and my microbenchmark. Radim _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
