On 5 Aug 2013, at 09:21, Galder Zamarreño <gal...@redhat.com> wrote:
> A very interesting thread in the JSR-107 group, which appears just as Mircea > has looked into the XA transactions and cache loaders/stores. Going back to > that thread, it wasn't very clear what would happen if Infinispan caches were > configured with XA transactions and they had a cache store. What's should a > user expect in that case? IOW, how does our approach here compare to what's > being suggested in the thread below? My feeling is that we're doing a variant > of Option 3, where each cache store will run its own transaction (if they > support it...) we're better than 3. 3 requires "that Caches would be the last-local-resource in XA transactions" (last local resource optimisation). We allow the cache to behave as a fully transactional (XA) resource and it is transparent for the user if a cache store is configured or not. > > @Manik, It's also interesting from a data grid perspective since it > highlights the boundaries of a cache vs data grid in this area. > Cheers, -- Mircea Markus Infinispan lead (www.infinispan.org) _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
