Hi Balazs, Thanks for the heads up.
On Oct 22, 2013, at 3:38 PM, Balázs Zsoldos <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > a couple of months ago I tested the new JSR-107 functionality of Infinispan. > Distribution and replication cache worked fine, however, I had problems with > invalidation cache type. If I called cache.put() or cache.update() the > entries were deleted from other nodes. In my understanding if I call > cache.update() the entries on other nodes should be deleted but they should > be left there if I call cache.put() on a new node. > > Am I wrong? Did you check this use-case? > > I opened a question on stackoverflow at > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16465807/jcache-api-usage-with-invalidation-clustered-cache > but nobody answered. > > I also opened a question in the Infinispan forum at > https://community.jboss.org/thread/228039 but nobody answered. ^ I've replied to that forum post now. > > Is JSR-107 functionality specified anywhere in case of using invalidation > cache? Distributed cache is great, however, in case of read-intensive large > data sets I think invalidation cache type cannot be avoided due to > performance reasons. > > Thanks and regards, > Balazs Zsoldos > Software Architect > Mobile: +36-70/594-92-34 > > Everit Kft. > https://www.everit.biz > > Everit OpenSource > http://everit.org > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev -- Galder Zamarreño [email protected] twitter.com/galderz Project Lead, Escalante http://escalante.io Engineer, Infinispan http://infinispan.org _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
