On Nov 19, 2013, at 4:39 PM, Dan Berindei <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think the properties format is too closely tied to your particular use case > - in general having a long prefix on every line would actual settings harder > to see than in a structured format like XML/JSON/YAML, not easier. And if the > cache name is repeated on every line, you can't easily compare the > configuration of two nodes or of two caches - all the lines would be > different. > > I'm also not sure about implementing > toProperties()/append(StringBuilder)/etc. in every configuration class > instead of using reflection. We already have a lot of changes to make when we > add/modify a setting, I'd rather not make that even harder than it is. +1. I think an reflection based approach (toProperties implemented in the base config class and iterating over all defined fields) should be easy to implement and solve the problem . Cheers, -- Mircea Markus Infinispan lead (www.infinispan.org) _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
