On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Pedro Ruivo <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On 11/22/2013 11:40 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote: > > > > > Do we still need to support the non-V8 implementations? > > Clearly there are cases in which we need it to be available: > > > org.infinispan.util.concurrent.locks.containers.AbstractPerEntryLockContainer<L> > > refers explicitly to EquivalentConcurrentHashMapV8 > > I don't think we need to support the non-v8 implementation but I'm not > aware of any BoundedConcurrentHashMapV8. So, if I have to choose, for me > it is simpler to change the current BounderConcurrentHashMap than > implement all the eviction policies on top of ECHM-V8. > To put it another way, we do need to support the non-v8 implementation because that's the only implementation of size-based eviction we've got :) AFAIK there are some lock-free implementations out there for LRU, and there may be some for LIRS as well. But our current implementations require a lock on the entire segment, so there is no simple way to make them work with CHMV8.
_______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
