I recently had a very bad experience with Kryo. A JGroups user used Kryo to marshal data types into byte buffers which he then broadcast around using JGroups (details in [1]).
Turns out the culprit was Kryo temporarily flipping bits in an already marshalled buffer passed to JGroups. Of course retransmission would then cause a corrupted buffer to be sent. The solution was to copy the buffer which forfeits the advantages of using Kryo. Not being an expert on Kryo, perhaps this could be done differently, e.g. by synchronizing around a buffer... [1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1718 On 31/01/14 17:59, Sanne Grinovero wrote: > Changing the subject, as Adrian will need a reply to his (more > important) question. > > I don't think we should go shopping for different marshaller > implementations, especially given other priorities. > > I've been keeping an eye on Kryo since a while and it looks very good > indeed, but JBMarshaller is serving us pretty well and I'm loving its > reliability. > > If we need more speed in this area, I'd rather see us perform some > very accurate benchmark development and try to understand why Kyro is > faster than JBM (if it really is), and potentially improve JBM. > For example as I've already suggested, it's using an internal > identityMap to detect graphs, and often we might not need that, or > also it would be nice to refactor it to write to an existing byte > stream rather than having it allocate internal buffers, and finally we > might want a "stateless edition" so to get rid of need for pooling of > JBMar instances. > > -- Sanne > > > > On 31 January 2014 16:29, Vladimir Blagojevic <vblag...@redhat.com> wrote: >> Not 100% related to what you are asking about but have a look at this >> post and the discussion that "erupted": >> >> http://gridgain.blogspot.ca/2012/12/java-serialization-good-fast-and-faster.html >> >> Vladimir >> On 1/30/2014, 7:13 AM, Adrian Nistor wrote: >>> Hi list! >>> >>> I've been pondering about re-using the marshalling machinery of >>> Infinispan in another project, specifically in ProtoStream, where I'm >>> planning to add it as a test scoped dependency so I can create a >>> benchmark to compare marshalling performace. I'm basically interested >>> in comparing ProtoStream and Infinispan's JBoss Marshalling based >>> mechanism. Comparing against plain JBMAR, without using the >>> ExternalizerTable and Externalizers introduced by Infinispan is not >>> going to get me accurate results. >>> >>> But how? I see the marshaling is spread across infinispan-commons and >>> infinispan-core modules. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> Adrian >>> _______________________________________________ >>> infinispan-dev mailing list >>> infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> infinispan-dev mailing list >> infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev > -- Bela Ban, JGroups lead (http://www.jgroups.org) _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
