Not sure I understand the need to compare this. JBMAR and ProtoStream are solving different problems. The former is focused on getting the best out of Java persistence. The latter is focused on serializing stuff in a plattform independent way.
IMO, it’s not an apples to apples comparison. Cheers, On 30 Jan 2014, at 13:13, Adrian Nistor <anis...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi list! > > I've been pondering about re-using the marshalling machinery of > Infinispan in another project, specifically in ProtoStream, where I'm > planning to add it as a test scoped dependency so I can create a > benchmark to compare marshalling performace. I'm basically interested > in comparing ProtoStream and Infinispan's JBoss Marshalling based > mechanism. Comparing against plain JBMAR, without using the > ExternalizerTable and Externalizers introduced by Infinispan is not > going to get me accurate results. > > But how? I see the marshaling is spread across infinispan-commons and > infinispan-core modules. > > Thanks! > Adrian > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev -- Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com twitter.com/galderz Project Lead, Escalante http://escalante.io Engineer, Infinispan http://infinispan.org _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
