On 13 March 2014 22:05, Mircea Markus <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mar 13, 2014, at 20:59, Ales Justin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>> - also important to notice that we will have both an Hadoop and an 
>>> Infinispan cluster running in parallel: the user will interact with the 
>>> former in order to run M/R tasks. Hadoop will use Infinispan (integration 
>>> achieved through InputFormat and OutputFormat ) in order to get the data to 
>>> be processed.
>>
>> Would this be 2 JVMs, or you can trick Hadoop to start Infinispan as well -- 
>> hence 1JVM?
>
> good point, ideally it should be a single VM: reduced serialization cost (in 
> vm access) and simpler architecture. That's if you're not using C/S mode, of 
> course.

?
Don't try confusing us again on that :-)
I think we agreed that the job would *always* run in strict locality
with the datacontainer (i.e. in the same JVM). Sure, an Hadoop client
would be connecting from somewhere else but that's unrelated.

>
> Cheers,
> --
> Mircea Markus
> Infinispan lead (www.infinispan.org)
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev

_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev

Reply via email to