On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Tristan Tarrant <ttarr...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 26/08/14 15:50, Dan Berindei wrote: > > > > The cluster registry also uses a clustered cache, how would we ship > > the cache configuration around for that cache? > Currently the configuration for the cluster registry is static, so there > isn't any need to propagate it. My reasoning obviously falls over when > we want to add some configuration to it, such as persistence. > Right, I was certain we already allowed the user to override the cluster registry cache config. Still, even if the configuration is static, I'm not a fan of adding yet another special case for the cluster registry cache. So I'm not completely sold on your idea yet :) > > > > The cluster registry is also too limited to do this check ATM, as it > > doesn't support conditional operations. I'm not sure whether that's > > because they just weren't needed, or it's an intentional limitation. > > > I think it was just laziness. > > Tristan > > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev >
_______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
