On 23 Sep 2014, at 15:39, William Burns <mudokon...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> If you do that you must also provide an abstract class with default noop
>>> operations that filter implementations would extend. Otherwise you are back
>>> with backward compatibility problems.
>>
>> KeyValueFilter was introduced in 7.0, or other backward compatibility
>> problem you have in mind?
>
> I believe Emmanuel is referring to if we added additional operations
> to the filter, but I am not sure what other operations we would want
> to add to it. If anything we would probably make a different type of
> filter specific to its use case.
Right, say at some point you offer a cluster wide topology change event and
send the keys involved.
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
