Galder, Manik, the jira you mention is ISPN-3140 JMX operation to suppress state transfer [1], implemented quite a long time ago. This should solve the problem of many simultaneous joiners. Does this fit your needs?
[1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3140 On 01/23/2015 06:10 PM, Galder Zamarreño wrote: > Hey Manik, I think I remember some JIRA to have a state transfer manually, > upon management operation or similar, in order to avoid state transfer mayhem > when bringing a lot of nodes at the same time. I don’t know what’s happened > to that, but would it work? > > Cheers, > > On 17 Jan 2015, at 02:43, Manik Surtani <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Greetings. :-) >> >> I chatted with a few of you offline about this earlier; anyone has any >> thoughts around a ClusterLoader implementation that, instead of broadcasting >> to the entire cluster, unicasts to the owners of a given key by inspecting >> the DistributionManager. Thinking of using this as a lazy/on-demand form of >> state transfer in a distributed cluster, so joiners don’t trigger big chunks >> of data moving around eagerly. >> >> • M >> _______________________________________________ >> infinispan-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev > > -- > Galder Zamarreño > [email protected] > twitter.com/galderz > > > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
