Hi all,

I had a chat earlier with Tristan and he pointed me to the metadata information 
that can be passed in script header.

Given that so far (until compatibility is supported), Javascript client only 
supports String key/values, a very simple solution to this problem would be to 
define a new metadata parameter, e.g. data-type, which can optionally define 
the type of key, value, parameters and returned object. E.g. in the javascript 
client case, I could just say: data-type=utf8 in the header of the script, and 
that would provide enough hints for the server to do its job by interpreting 
byte arrays dealt with in exec command as UTF-8 strings.

This method is much more user friendly than having user plug a marshaller since 
it only requires a small change in the header of the script, as opposed to 
having to change server side configuration. I'm working on a prototype for this 
with hopes to include in 8.2.

Cheers,
--
Galder Zamarreño
Infinispan, Red Hat

> On 29 Feb 2016, at 14:35, Vittorio Rigamonti <vriga...@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi All, Hi Galder
> 
> JBasicMarshaller.h is not an intent to go further along the way to implement 
> a c++ JBossMarshaller, it has the only goal to provide a working 'exec' 
> operation.
> The c++ exec currently works only with integer and "small" string data types, 
> user can easily extends the marshaller to other basic types.
> 
> My current model of the exec use case is this one (maybe it's too simplistic 
> so correct me if I'm wrong): a "user defined consumer" consumes data produced 
> by a "user defined producer", so maybe it could worth to evaluate a solution 
> where the framework provides a common standard for communication (stringified 
> json? or JSObject for in memory 100% Java) and let the user handle it's own 
> data.
> This is a proposal approach specific to the exec scope, I can't say if it can 
> be extended as a general approach where marshalling is involved.
> 
> Cheers,
> Vittorio
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Galder Zamarreño" <gal...@redhat.com>
> To: "infinispan -Dev List" <infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 11:28:55 AM
> Subject: [infinispan-dev] HotRod exec operation tight coupling with JBoss     
> Marshaller
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> While implement `exec` operation for the JS client, I've encountered an issue 
> with how the exec parameters and return types are marshalled. 
> 
> The essence of the problem is that the server marshalls these objects instead 
> of having the client drive how these are marshalled. As a result of this, for 
> a JS or C++ client to be able to use `exec` with default configuration, they 
> need to understand JBoss Marshaller format, which is not good.
> 
> I'm not sure this would have been unavoidable due to the characteristics of 
> `exec` but I wanted to see if we can find a good way to solve or get around 
> this issue. Long term, we need better encoding handling both for incoming and 
> returning types, but the question is whether we can find a way to better 
> solve this until then. Here are some options:
> 
> - For the C++ client, Vittorio has part implemented the JBoss Marshaller 
> format [1], but I'm kinda reluctant to go down this path since that creates a 
> lot of work for us as the number of types that can be discovered in a JBoss 
> Marshaller format byte array are quite considerable [2]. We're bound to miss 
> one of those and since clients could execute any script, the chances are high 
> IMO...
> 
> - An alternative would be for the JS/C++ clients to only support exec when 
> the marshaller is one that enables compatibility mode. The idea here is that 
> for compatibility mode to work, all clients involved are going to be set up 
> with a marshaller that can work for all of them. Working on such marshaller 
> is time better spent than on implementing the JBoss Marshaller format. We had 
> a separate discussion on this topic in another dev thread...
> 
> Any other ideas someone might have?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> [1] 
> https://github.com/infinispan/cpp-client/blob/master/include/infinispan/hotrod/JBasicMarshaller.h
> [2] 
> https://github.com/jboss-remoting/jboss-marshalling/blob/master/river/src/main/java/org/jboss/marshalling/river/Protocol.java
> --
> Galder Zamarreño
> Infinispan, Red Hat
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev


_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev

Reply via email to