Hi all, A Hot Rod protocol change might be required as a result of [1].
In essence, the Hot Rod protocol does not specify how remote exec calls that return null should respond back to the client [2]. Returning an empty byte[] won't cut it since returning an empty String would be represented that way, and that's different to null. I don't know how this could be handled without modifying the protocol, any ideas? If modifying the protocol, adding a new status code would be a way to handle it. Thoughts? [1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6406 [2] http://infinispan.org/docs/8.2.x/user_guide/user_guide.html#_hot_rod_protocol_2_0 -- Galder Zamarreño Infinispan, Red Hat _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
