On 16/12/16 13:12, Emmanuel Bernard wrote: > >> On 16 Dec 2016, at 09:48, Tristan Tarrant <ttarr...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> On 16/12/16 09:34, Emmanuel Bernard wrote: >>>> Yes, the above design is what sprung to mind initially. Not sure about >>>> the need of keeping the log in memory, as we would probably need some >>>> form of persistent log for cache shutdown. Since this looks a lot like >>>> the append-log of the Artemis journal, maybe we could use that. >>> >>> Well, when the cache is shut down, don’t we have time to empty the >>> in-memory log? >> >> Cache shutdown should not be deferred because there is a backlog of >> events that haven't been forwarded to Debezium, so we would want to pick >> up from where we were when we restart the cache. > > But you’re willing to wait for the Artemis journal finish writing? I don’t > quite see the difference.
I'm thinking about the case where Debezium is temporarily not able to collect the changes. Tristan -- Tristan Tarrant Infinispan Lead JBoss, a division of Red Hat _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
