You want to use OpenSSL with Netty: http://netty.io/wiki/requirements-for-4.x.html#wiki-h4-4
Tristan On 31/03/2017 15:55, Sebastian Laskawiec wrote: > Unfortunately TLS still slows down stuff (a lot). When I was doing tests > for the multi-tenancy router (which is based on TLS/SNI), my average > results were like this: > > Use-caseTypeAvgError > initConnectionAndPerform10KPutsSingleServerNoSsl1034.81714.424 > initConnectionAndPerform10KPutsSingleServerWithSsl1567.55324.872 > initConnectionAndPerform10KPutsTwoServersWithSslSni1563.22934.05 > initConnectionOnlySingleServerNoSsl*3.389*0.198 > initConnectionOnlySingleServerWithSsl*14.086*0.794 > initConnectionOnlyTwoServersWithSslSni*14.722*0.684 > perform10KPutsSingleServerNoSsl*4.602*0.585 > perform10KPutsSingleServerWithSsl*16.583*0.198 > perform10KPutsTwoServersWithSslSni*17.02*0.794 > > This is nothing new, but initializing Hot Rod connection took was ~4 > times slower and putting 10K random strings (UUIDs) was also ~4 times > slower. But what's worth to mention, there is no significant difference > between TLS and TLS+SNI. > > As far as I know, it is possible to install specialized hardware to deal > with encryption in data centers. It is called SSL Acceleration [1]. > However I'm not aware of any special processor instructions that can > help you with that. But the implementations are getting better and > better, so who knows... > > But getting back to the original question, I think the problem we are > trying to solve (correct me if I'm wrong) is to prevent unauthorized > folks to put their hands on a victims data (either pushing something > malicious/corrupted to the cache or obtaining something from the cache). > Another problem is transmission security - encryption. If we want our > new devs to be secured out of the box, I think we should do both - use > TLS (without trusting all certificated) and authentication. This makes > Infinispan harder to use of course. So the other extremum is to turn > both things off. > > I voted for the latter, making Infinispan super easy to use. But you > guys convinced me that we should care about the security in this case > too, so I would use PLAIN authentication + TLS. I would also love to see > one magic switch, for example `./bin/standalone.sh --dev-mode`, which > would turn all security off. > > Thanks, > Sebastian > > [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SSL_acceleration > > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 9:22 PM Dan Berindei <dan.berin...@gmail.com > <mailto:dan.berin...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > I agree with Radim, PLAIN authentication without encryption makes it > too easy to sniff the password from another machine. > > I have no idea how expensive SSL encryption is in WildFly, but I think > all recent processors have specialized instructions for helping with > encryption, so it may not be that bad. > > Even with encryption, if the client trusts all certs, it may be > possible for an attacker to insert itself in the middle and decode > everything -- depending on network topology and what kind of access > the attacker already has. I think it only makes sense to trust all > certs if we also implement something like HPKP [1], to make it more > like ssh. > > [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_Public_Key_Pinning > > Cheers > Dan > > > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Wolf Fink <wf...@redhat.com > <mailto:wf...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > +1 to make the default secure. > > > > -1 SSL by default as it makes it slower and I think not most will > use it > > > > -1 easy trust all certs, That sounds to me we close one door and > make it > > possible to open another one > > > > > > What if we add an example configuration unsecured which can be > simple copied > > for examples and to start. > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:31 PM, Dennis Reed <der...@redhat.com > <mailto:der...@redhat.com>> wrote: > >> > >> +1 to authentication and encryption by default. > >> This is 2017, that's how *everything* should be configured. > >> > >> -1 to making it easy to trust all certs. That negates the point of > >> using encryption in the first place and should really never be done. > >> > >> If it's too hard to configure the correct way that we think it would > >> turn users away, that's a usability problem that needs to be fixed. > >> > >> -Dennis > >> > >> > >> On 03/30/2017 09:29 AM, Tristan Tarrant wrote: > >> > While the "unsecure" over loopback is quite tempting, I would > prefer to > >> > have homogeneous behaviour with the possibility to disable > security > >> > altogether for quick demos. > >> > Otherwise a developer would need to code differently for the > local use > >> > case than for the remote one, causing more confusion. > >> > > >> > Tristan > >> > > >> > On 30/03/2017 14:54, Sebastian Laskawiec wrote: > >> >> I agree the security out of the box is good. But at the same > time we > >> >> don't want to make Infinispan harder to use for new > developers. Out of > >> >> the box configuration should be "good enough" to start hacking. > >> >> > >> >> I would propose to make all the endpoints unprotected (with > >> >> authentication disabled) on localhost/loopback and protected when > >> >> calling from the outside world. > >> >> > >> >> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 2:39 PM Tristan Tarrant > <ttarr...@redhat.com <mailto:ttarr...@redhat.com> > >> >> <mailto:ttarr...@redhat.com <mailto:ttarr...@redhat.com>>> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Dear all, > >> >> > >> >> after a mini chat on IRC, I wanted to bring this to > everybody's > >> >> attention. > >> >> > >> >> We should make the Hot Rod endpoint require > authentication in the > >> >> out-of-the-box configuration. > >> >> The proposal is to enable the PLAIN (or, preferably, > DIGEST) SASL > >> >> mechanism against the ApplicationRealm and require users > to run the > >> >> add-user script. > >> >> This would achieve two goals: > >> >> - secure out-of-the-box configuration, which is always a > good idea > >> >> - access to the "protected" schema and script caches which is > >> >> prevented > >> >> when not on loopback on non-authenticated endpoints. > >> >> > >> >> Tristan > >> >> -- > >> >> Tristan Tarrant > >> >> Infinispan Lead > >> >> JBoss, a division of Red Hat > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> infinispan-dev mailing list > >> >> infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org > <mailto:infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org> > >> >> <mailto:infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org > <mailto:infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org>> > >> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> infinispan-dev mailing list > >> >> infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org > <mailto:infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org> > >> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev > >> >> > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > >> infinispan-dev mailing list > >> infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org > <mailto:infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org> > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > infinispan-dev mailing list > > infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org > <mailto:infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org <mailto:infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev > -- Tristan Tarrant Infinispan Lead JBoss, a division of Red Hat _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
