One final thing, [1] requires ISPN-7853 fix, which will be part of 9.0.1. I know the branch currently points to 9.1.0-SNAPSHOT. That was just simply cos I tested out the fix in master first.
Cheers, -- Galder Zamarreño Infinispan, Red Hat > On 23 May 2017, at 15:07, Galder Zamarreño <gal...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I've just finished integrating Infinispan with a HB 6.x branch Steve had, all > tests pass now [1]. > > Yeah, we didn't commit on the final location for these changes. > > As far as I know, Hibernate master is not 6.x, but rather 5.2.x. There's no > 5.2.x branch in Hibernate main repo. 6.x is just a branch that Steve has. > > These are the options availble to us: > > 1. Integrate 9.x provider as part of 'hibernate-infinispan' in Hibernate 6.x > branch. > > 2. Integrate 9.x provider as part of a second Infinispan module in Hibernate > 5.x branch. > > 3. Integrate 9.x provider as part of 'hibernate-infinispan' in Hibernate 5.x > branch. This is problematic for since the provider is not backwards > compatible. > > 4. Integrate 9.x provider in infinispan and deliver it as part of Infinispan > rather than Hibernate. > > I'm not sure which one I prefer the most TBH... 1. is the ideal solution but > doesn't seem there will be a Hibernate 6.x release for a while. 2./3./4. all > have their downsides... :\ > > Thoughts? > > [1] https://github.com/galderz/hibernate-orm/commits/t_i9x_v2 > -- > Galder Zamarreño > Infinispan, Red Hat > >> On 16 May 2017, at 17:06, Paul Ferraro <paul.ferr...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> Thanks Galder. I read through the infinispan-dev thread on the >> subject, but I'm not sure what was concluded regarding the eventual >> home for this code. >> Once the testsuite passes, is the plan to commit to hibernate master? >> If so, I will likely fork >> these changes into a WF module (and adapt it >> for Hibernate 5.1.x) so that WF12 can move to JGroups4+Infinispan9 >> until Hibernate6 is integrated. >> >> Radim - one thing you mentioned on that infinispan-dev thread puzzled >> me: you said that invalidation mode offers no benefits over >> replication. How is that possible? Can you elaborate? >> >> Paul >> >> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Galder Zamarreño <gal...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> I'm on the move, not sure if Paul/Radim saw my replies: >>> >>> <pferraro> galderz, rvansa: Hey guys - is there a plan for Hibernate & >>> ISPN 9? >>> <rvansa> pferraro: Galder has been working on that >>> <rvansa> pferraro: though I haven't seen any results but a list of >>> stuff that needs to be changed >>> <pferraro> galderz: which Hibernate branch are you targeting? >>> <rvansa> pferraro: 5.2, but there are minute differences between 5.x >>> in terms of the parts that need love to get Infinispan 9 support >>> *** Mode change: +v vblagoje on #infinispan by ChanServ >>> (ChanServ@services.) >>> <pferraro> rvansa: are you suggesting that 5.0 or 5.1 branches will be >>> adapted to additionally support infinispan 9? how is that >>> possible? >>>> pferraro: i'm working on it as we speak... >>>> pferraro: down to 16 failuresd >>>> pferraro: i started a couple of months ago, but had talks/demos to >>> prepare >>>> pferraro: i've got back to working on it this week >>> ... >>>> pferraro: rvansa >>>> rvansa: minute differences my ass ;p >>>> pferraro: did you see my replies? >>>> i got disconnected while replying... >>> <pferraro> hmm - no - I didn't >>> <pferraro> galderz: ^ >>>> pferraro: so, working on the HB + I9 integration as we speak >>>> pferraro: i started a couple of months back but had talks/demos to >>> prepare and had to put that aside >>>> pferraro: i'm down to 16 failures >>>> pferraro: serious refactoring required of the integration to get it >>> to compile and the tests to pass >>>> pferraro: need to switch to async interceptor stack in 2lc >>> integration and get all the subtle changes right >>>> pferraro: it's a painstaking job basically >>>> pferraro: i'm working on >>> https://github.com/galderz/hibernate-orm/tree/t_i9x_v2 >>>> pferraro: i can't remember where i branched off, but it's a branch >>> that steve had since master was focused on 5.x >>>> pferraro: i've no idea when/where we'll integrate this, but one >>> thing is for sure: it's nowhere near backwards compatible >>>> actually, fixed one this morning, so down to 15 failures >>>> pferraro: any suggestions/wishes? >>>> is anyone out there? ;) >>> >>> Cheers, >>> -- >>> Galder Zamarreño >>> Infinispan, Red Hat >>> > _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
