Yes, exactly. Sorry if I didn't make it clear enough... On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 4:31 PM Alan Field <afi...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hey Sebastian, > > I completely agree that hosting [1] in the /rest context is superior to > [2]. I think that is what you are proposing, right? :-) > > Thanks, > Alan > > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Sebastian Laskawiec" <slask...@redhat.com> > *To: *"infinispan -Dev List" <infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org> > *Sent: *Tuesday, June 13, 2017 9:10:40 AM > *Subject: *[infinispan-dev] REST content directory > > > > Hey, > > A while ago I noticed that we have static directory with some information > about REST interface in the feature pack [1]. The directory is put in the > server distribution ($ISPN_HOME/rest). > > Our REST server doesn't host those files when accessing /rest context. We > host [2] in this scenario. Those two web pages differ from each other and I > must admit, that [1] is much better. > > I would like to propose removing [1] from the feature pack and serving it > in the /rest context. Would you agree? > > Thanks, > Sebastian > > [1] > https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/tree/master/server/integration/feature-pack/src/main/resources/content/rest > [2] > https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/tree/master/server/rest/src/main/resources > -- > > SEBASTIAN ŁASKAWIEC > > INFINISPAN DEVELOPER > > Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> > <https://red.ht/sig> > > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev -- SEBASTIAN ŁASKAWIEC INFINISPAN DEVELOPER Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> <https://red.ht/sig>
_______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
