I've searched for an answer to this specific question, but turned up nothing specific.
Is series cardinality affected by actual use, or by combinatorial math alone? For example: metric,asset_id=abc,geohash=gbsuv7ztq metric,asset_id=xyz,geohash=gbsuv7ztr ... in this schema, a series will have been generated by some asset (important information), and that asset will have a location associated with it. But, the location of each asset will be unique to that asset alone. Asset 'abc' will never be located somewhere else and therefore will only ever have that one geohash. This is relational data, of course, which I am trying to shoehorn into a time-series database - but only for the sake of getting data plotted in Grafana's new WorldMap panel. Any clarification of cardinality in this situation would be helpful. I'm expecting to have ~200k assets (and therefore ~200k geohashes) at maximum. Alternatively, if anyone has more experience with geohashing for grafana or can point me to resources, I'd be very grateful. -- Remember to include the InfluxDB version number with all issue reports --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "InfluxDB" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/influxdb. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/influxdb/9484b7d6-c6ae-4cd1-ac57-7c9eeae3f355%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
