A time series database is not a relational database, and comes with intentional limitations to increase throughput. I don't know if raw write performance is the best way to differentiate the tools. InfluxDB can handle writes of ~500k values per second on a reasonable server, and InfluxEnterprise can raise to over 1 million values per second by distributing the load across the cluster.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 6:38 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > Is there a performance comparison of InfluxDB against some RDBMS? More > particularly, how does InfluxDB stack up against RDBMS on SSDs (where > random disk seeks are not very expensive). > > Thanks > > -- > Remember to include the version number! > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "InfluxData" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/influxdb. > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ > msgid/influxdb/c8a94a77-b634-44ab-a8bc-1cd9f8383183%40googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Sean Beckett Director of Support and Professional Services InfluxDB -- Remember to include the version number! --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "InfluxData" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/influxdb. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/influxdb/CALGqCvM60K%2B0zfQStWU%3D%3DcpbUcbt6KYpY_S4uAUxGRVsc8v2VA%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
