Op dinsdag 15 december 2015 02:16:02 UTC+1 schreef Sean Beckett:
> If you have highly dynamic data, that should be stored as a field, not a tag. 
> That makes it impossible to use with GROUP BY clauses, however, which I 
> suspect is a non-starter for you.

Is there a way to guesstimate the memory requirements from the cardinality? 
We're looking to analyse how people flow through our building by analysing our 
radius logs. From these, we get a measurement approx every 30 seconds per user 
that couples a user (or device) to an access point. Picking a random day from 
the logs puts us at 7.5k access points to which some 500 users connected. 
That'd get us a cardinality of about 3.75M... that's not going to end well I 
take it then. If we broaden the sample, we're likely to approach 30k users over 
the lifetime of the analysis.

-- 
Remember to include the version number!
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"InfluxData" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/influxdb.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/influxdb/3d709e55-7a67-44c8-9b35-79693e26e65c%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to