Just a little background on the CERN results, since I’m not sure it’s clear
in their presentation - they were using a very old version of InfluxDB
(either v0.8 or v0.9), and it had very different (read: underwhelming)
performance characteristics back then. We’ve moved to an all-new storage
engine (TSM) since then, among many other significant performance and
stability changes. It’s definitely safe to say that InfluxDB outperforms
Elasticsearch for time series data now.

I don’t have any experience with using Aerospike for time series, so I
can’t speak to the performance comparison there. Maybe someone else on the
list can?

Todd

On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 4:19 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> In working on a data ingestion platform, one of the requirements is a
> low-latency real-time ML-related response using Kafka Streams.
>
> Kafka is used as the message broker, and as of v0.10, Kafka Streams will
> be used in the place of something like Flink or Spark.  Given the TICK
> stack, how would Telegraph fit in with Kafka Connect?
>
> The initial database to use was ElasticSearch, as another one of the
> requirements was to have text proximity search results and NLP. However,
> since that is a completely separate use-case from time-series data, we'll
> stick with the real-time requirement and a separate database for this use
> case:
>
> Aerospike
> InfluxDB
> OpenTSDB
>
> This guy at CERN http://cds.cern.ch/record/2011172/files/LHCb-TALK-2015-
> 060.pdf determined that ElasticSearch was the clear winner over InfluxDB
> for time-series data.
>
> However reviewing Influx's results https://www.influxdata.com/
> influxdb-markedly-elasticsearch-in-time-series-data-metrics-benchmark/,
> it is the clear winner over ElasticSearch.
>
> I'm sure I could find other contradicting results for anything else (but
> really what was missed in the testing?).
>
> I would like to know from those who have actually implemented these
> systems what the experience-based winner is, more specifically, between
> Aerospike and InfluxDB.
>
> --
> Remember to include the version number!
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "InfluxData" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/influxdb.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/
> msgid/influxdb/19f67d62-b3d4-4dd9-ad43-7d7edca124c1%40googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
Remember to include the version number!
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"InfluxData" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/influxdb.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/influxdb/CAKozqAqKWoi25cMdex-p3x3cE-nh2t-P729Lua5hupP%2Bbdvqkg%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to