5])
        by mx2.transarc.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA22782
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 4 Nov 1998 16:26:46 -0500 (EST)
        (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from quiver.hursley.ibm.com (quiver.hursley.ibm.com [9.20.2.248]) by\
 mail-gw.hursley.ibm.com (AIX4.3/UCB 8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA10328; Wed,\
 4 Nov 1998 21:38:46 GMT
Received: by quiver.hursley.ibm.com (AIX4.3/UCB 8.8.8) id VAA33526; Wed, 4 Nov\
 1998 21:38:46 GMT
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: AFS administration utility?
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1998 21:38:45 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\
 from "Mark Montague" at Nov 4, 98 10:10:04 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text

Mark,

Have you considered having separate AFS cells for each department?
-- 
paul                             http://acm.org/~mpb

>Hello, info-afs members,
>
>The College of Literature, Science and the Arts at the University of
>Michigan would like to find out if anyone using AFS is aware of software
>that will permit "distributed administration" of AFS.  AFS, out-of-the-box,
>allows all-or-nothing delegation of authority:  either someone has the
>authority to administer some aspect of AFS for the entire AFS cell or they
>do not have the ability to do it for any of the AFS cell.
>
>We are looking for a solution that will let us delegate authority on a
>department-by-department basis so that we can, for example, give an
>administrator in the Department of Physics full rights to manipluate
>user accounts and AFS volumes, BUT only if they belong to Physics.  We
>would like to ensure that the AFS administrator in Physics cannot accidently
>damage resources belonging to other departments, such as Economics or
>Mathematics.
>
>We are aware of a package called ADM written at Carnegie Mellon University
>that will permit this.  The problem is that it does not appear to be
>developed or maintained anymore -- the version we have is 0.36 from August
>1995.  Can anyone suggest alternatives?  We are prepared to write our own
>solution, but want to be sure that we are not re-inventing the wheel before
>we begin.
>
>Thanks for any help you can provide.  If anyone is interested in a summary
>of what I find out, let me know and I will send you one or post one to
>the info-afs mailing list.
>
>
>                Mark Montague
>                Unix Infrastructure Lead
>                LS&A System Services Team
>                [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to