Stephen Joyce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have absolutely NO experience with it, so I do not know how mature it
> is, but have you evaluated arla to see if it meets your needs? Arla
> claims to be "a free, mostly independently written, implementation of
> the client side of the Andrew File System."
It works pretty well on Linux and may actually be better than the Transarc
client depending on what your needs are. (I think the Transarc client is
stabler and performs better when it's available, but it's only available
for a very limited set of Linux kernels whereas Arla will compile for
pretty much anything.)
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>