Re: administrivia request: Reply-To: info-afs@transarc.com

[Neil Crellin]

Paul Blackburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> IMHO, it is useful and it saves me time when processing email in "elm".
> I like it on mailing lists that do add a Reply-To: header.

> Any other views?

Use the "Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" header to do what you're
trying to do without taking away the choice of reply-to behaviour from the
recipient.  If you can't make elm do that, I can hightly recommend gnus to
you.