Russ Allbery sez:
> I'm surprised to see someone using a cache that large.  Our experience had
> been that the cache search time got extremely bad with large caches and
> that performance actually increased with a smaller cache size.  What block
> size are you using with that cache?

Well, like I said, vice cache is like swap space, you can have too much as
easily as too little :-).  The biggest problem we've found with the huge cache
is not performance problems (that Alpha kicks butts & takes names) but every
six months or so the cache gets completely corrupted & crashes or wedges the
machine.  Every 2 to 3 of these requires a complete cache rebuild.

That said, we're using the default block size.  I never thought before to
change this!  I think I will look more into it, it may enable us to use a
smaller cache & have less frequent problems.

Thanks!

e.
----------------------------------------------------------------
     [EMAIL PROTECTED]     Esther Filderman    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Senior System Mangler, News & AFS Dominatrix  
               Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center


Reply via email to