>Why 32? Why not 4 gazillion... We thought that increasing the number of port offsets to 32 was reasonable. >Seriously, why not make it something so large, yet reasonable, such that >we won't have to bother you guys in the next 5 to 10 years. How about 256? We'll take your suggestion into consideration. However, we're unable to make any promises at this time. We'll be better able to determine any restrictions when we start work on this feature. Thanks for your input! Kathy
- 8 tape drives per cell? Michael Fagan
- Re: 8 tape drives per cell? Kathleen_Rizzuti
- Re: 8 tape drives per cell? Michael Fagan
- Re: Fwd: 8 tape drives per cell? Kathleen_Rizzuti
- Re: Fwd: 8 tape drives per cell? Stergios
- Re: Fwd: 8 tape drives per cell? Mac Mathis
- Re: Fwd: 8 tape drives per cell? Mark Giuffrida
