Excerpts from mail: 24-Aug-93 util_GetLong michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] (620)

>   Marcus Watts noticed that 'pts e x<ptsid>' will give the same
> response as 'pts e <ptsid>', and after looking through the code found
> util_GetLong's parsing routine is (in my opinion) slightly off.

We reported this back in February and complained about Transarc mucking
with this command.  There was nothing wrong with the old pts, so with
all of the other problems that need to be fixed, why waste time "fixing"
something that was not broken?

We are still using the 3.1b version of pts to get around this problem.


        jeff

Reply via email to