>> Here, we use AMS (the Andrew Mail System), and it's associated
>> delivery system.  It's much more robust in the face of the temporary
>> failures you can see in a distributed environment.

Another option, if you don't want to deal with AMS (since it's a bit
baroque) is to use a POP3 client, and not try to store your mail
spools in AFS.  If security is a concern, mh 6.8 has a kerberized POP3
client/server in it.

                Marc

Reply via email to