>> Here, we use AMS (the Andrew Mail System), and it's associated
>> delivery system. It's much more robust in the face of the temporary
>> failures you can see in a distributed environment.
Another option, if you don't want to deal with AMS (since it's a bit
baroque) is to use a POP3 client, and not try to store your mail
spools in AFS. If security is a concern, mh 6.8 has a kerberized POP3
client/server in it.
Marc
- e-mail over AFS ! Arnoldo Araya
- Re: e-mail over AFS ! Pat_Barron
- Re: e-mail over AFS ! Marc Horowitz
- Re: e-mail over AFS ! Bob Dew
- Re: e-mail over AFS ! Steve_Lammert
- Re: e-mail over AFS ! Marc Horowitz
- Re: e-mail over AFS ! Steve Lammert
- Re: e-mail over AFS ! Bob Dew
- Re: e-mail over AFS ! Lyle_Seaman
- Re: e-mail over AFS ! Lyle_Seaman
- Re: e-mail over AFS ! John Gardiner Myers
- Re: e-mail over AFS ! Matthew V. J. Whalen
- Re: e-mail over AFS ! Marc Horowitz
