> ... on the other hand the fact that setuid-ignoring is a per-cell > and not also a per-volume (or at least, per-fileserver) flag still > bites. As long as a complete cell is running with ONE server key, an administrator for part of the cell is an administrator for all of the cell. As only administrators can create a setuid root file, whatis the point in having a per-volume or per-server flag? -- Michael Niksch TEL: +41-1-7248-913 IBM Zurich Research Laboratory FAX: +41-1-7103608 Saeumerstrasse 4 BITNET/VNET: NIK at ZURICH CH-8803 Rueschlikon / Switzerland INTERNET/IBMIPNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: database server behavior during network p... Rens Troost
- Re: database server behavior during netw... Marcus Watts
- database server behavior during network parti... Mark H. Linehan (8-863-7860)
- Re: database server behavior during netw... Michael Niksch
- Re: database server behavior during network p... Mark Giuffrida
- Re: database server behavior during netw... Rens Troost
- Re: database server behavior during netw... Perry E. Metzger
- Re: database server behavior during ... Bruce Howard
- Re: database server behavior dur... Lyle_Seaman
- Re: database server behavior... John Hascall
- Re: database server beh... Michael Niksch
- Re: database server behavior... Rens Troost
- Re: database server behavior... Perry E. Metzger
- Re: database server behavior... Paul Vickers
- Re: database server behavior... Michael Niksch
- Re: database server behavior during network p... Joseph W. Sieczkowski
