Brian, I tried it (with nrt) and it didn't work out to well. Rambling off the top of my head, which I often do, we found that although the AFS port #'s (in the 700 range) are well known, there are other port #'s (> 1024 I think) that were being randomly used. These lower port #'s were being used for things such as klog, etc. Someone correct me if I am wrong. Later, ---------------------------------------------------------- Michael S. Fagan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- AFS through firewall Brian Jensen
- Re: AFS through firewall Michael Fagan
- Re: AFS through firewall Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: AFS through firewall Michael Fagan
- Re: AFS through firewall Paul Blackburn
