Message dated Wednesday, 28 Jun 191995, 1:03pm BST
from "Paul Blackburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
> We do that and it works well here. On clients, we have a symbolic link:
> /usr/afsws => /afs/aixssc.uk.ibm.com/@sys/usr/afsws
>
> I like this because there is one master copy: updates propagate pretty quickl
y!
> I'd like to understand why you think it is better to have local /usr/afsws.
We do this as well, but the advantage to having /usr/afsws local is that
if you lose your fileservers you still have the AFS commands on the local
machine to fix things with.
-- Scott
- AFS client file ownership and mode bits recommendatio... Larry Stone, x4-4725
- Re: AFS client file ownership and mode bits reco... Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: AFS client file ownership and mode bits reco... Paul Blackburn
- Re: AFS client file ownership and mode bits reco... Paul Blackburn
- Re: AFS client file ownership and mode bits ... Jeffrey J. Carpenter
- Re: AFS client file ownership and mode bits ... Scott Grosch
- Re: AFS client file ownership and mode bits ... Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: AFS client file ownership and mode bits reco... Paul Blackburn
- Re: AFS client file ownership and mode bits reco... Larry Stone, x4-4725
- Re: AFS client file ownership and mode bits ... Bruce_A . _Bollinger
- Re: AFS client file ownership and mode bits reco... Pat Wilson
- Re: AFS client file ownership and mode bits ... Lyle Seaman
