On Mon, 17 Jul 1995, Phil Pishioneri wrote:
>
> If we're voting, I think we'd like to see the problem of "time outs" [1]
> corrected before that of multi-home db servers. While the solution
> of separate db servers does cost money, at least it's easily solved.
>
> [1] The problem (mentioned before on this list) where an application
> receives an ETIMEDOUT (errno==78) because an AFS client has lost
> contact with a fileserver. We'd like to see an AFS client act similarly
> to an NFS client which has mounted a filesystem with the "hard,intr"
> options.
Oh, yes please!! How about an option on afsd? Or an 'fs setxxx' command?
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Rainer Toebbicke [EMAIL PROTECTED] -or- [EMAIL PROTECTED] O__
European Laboratory for Particle Physics(CERN) - Geneva, Switzerland > |
Phone: +41 22 767 4911 Fax: +41 22 767 8690 ( )\( )
