>I beleive that there have been sufficient enough changes to the Linux
>kernel that it will require more than just "rebuilding AFS" to get it
>working. I haven't looked closely, but I suspect I would take a bit
i ported afs 3.6 to linux 2.4.0-test? since i wanted atm and afs (yes,
both at the same time, imagine that) it was very difficult and it
seems fairly stable non-smp. i believe i have a strange smp problem
(probably due to some leftover locks that have not yet been removed)
but since i developed this mainly on the ppc i dont run smp generally.
i dont know what to do with the diffs really. i could put them up
on our transarc.com contrib area.
>of manpower to actually up-port the AFS code. I have no idea if
>Transarc plans to do that work, nor do I know if that work would make
a transarc employee told me that they were starting development on
for linux 2.4 but i have no idea of their schedule. transarc says
lots of things. im still waiting for the beta for solaris8. it took
me a day to port the 3.6 client to solaris8 (it was pretty trivial)
where is openafs already?
