I'd say that it should be at least in sync with IBM AFS to keep
compatibility as much as possible...
Gregory Touretsky
IDC Computing / Systems Engineering Group
Unix Server Platforms
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (+) 972-4-865-6377, Fax: 04-865-5999
iNET: 465-6377, M/S: IDC-1B
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Blackburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 3:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OpenAFS: conventions for new @sys? (rs_aix43 s390_linux22)
Dear AFS Folks,
I am looking at OpenAFS src/config/afs_sysnames.h
and I see that there are all the Transarc defined
@sys names. For example:
#define SYS_NAME_ID_i386_linux2 1500
#define SYS_NAME_ID_i386_linux22 1501
It seems to me that any new @sys definitions
should be agreed across the AFS community
and not just chosen at random?
I would like to propose:
#define SYS_NAME_ID_rs_aix43 704
#define SYS_NAME_ID_s390_linux22 1504
Are these OK?
Is there a process for defining new @sys?
--
cheers
paul http://acm.org/~mpb
