Re: OpenAFS: conventions for new @sys? (rs_aix43 s390_linux22)

[Russ Allbery]

Johan Danielsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>> I *would* like to see @sys names chosen on more criteria than just what
>> version of AFS client is associated with that system

> The problem with this is that it would require longer sysnames, and that
> will more likely break the 32 (or 31, i can never remember) volume name
> limit.

I don't see why.  Among the officially supported Transarc AFS clients, the
only one that currently needs to be split for the purposes of most
applications is rs_aix42 (into rs_aix42 and rs_aix43).

-- 
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED])             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>