Phil Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This is one area where NFS has leap frogged AFS in a big way. MP fast > client and server NFS implementations are commonly available, and the RW > performance blows AFS away. > AFS' fortes are RO redundancy, WAN performance, and administration, > but NOT RW performance. Wholeheartedly seconded. It's really depressing to see how little work we can get out of MP systems for stuff we'd really like to throw MP systems at, such as bunches of remote users logging on to read Pine. The system practically may as well not have more than one processor when lots of AFS writes are going on. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
- OpenAFS Project List Laura Stentz
- Re: OpenAFS Project List Lyle Seaman
- Re: "hard mounts" Lyle Seaman
- Re: "hard mounts" Nathan Neulinger
- Re: "hard mounts" Lyle Seaman
- [OpenAFS] Re: "hard mounts" Phil . Moore
- [OpenAFS] Re: "hard mounts" Russ Allbery
- [OpenAFS] Re: "hard mounts" Phil . Moore
- Re: [OpenAFS] OpenAFS Project List Nathan Neulinger
- Re: [OpenAFS] OpenAFS Project List Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: [OpenAFS] OpenAFS Project List Nathan Neulinger
- Re: [OpenAFS] OpenAFS Project List Derrick J Brashear
- Re: [OpenAFS] OpenAFS Project List Derrick J Brashear
- Re: [OpenAFS] OpenAFS Project List Ken Hornstein
- Re: [OpenAFS] OpenAFS Project List Douglas E. Engert
- Re: [OpenAFS] OpenAFS Project List David Thompson
- Re: [OpenAFS] OpenAFS Project List Derrick J Brashear
