Brandon Craig Rhodes writes: > > The correct behavior is of course to put recv(...) in a loop that > continues filling buf[] until it reaches some terminating condition, > such as when it sees a newline. I have tested this and it solves my > problem. Does it look to those of you with more experience with CVS > as though I have diagnosed this problem correctly? Should I submit > this as a patch?
As long as you pick the terminating condition carefully so as to avoid waiting forever, it seems reasonable to me. -Larry Jones My life needs a rewind/erase button. -- Calvin _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
