On Monday, February 14, Tony Hoyle wrote:
>
> Actually separating 'bad user' from 'bad cvsroot' has halved the number of te
> ch. support
> requests I get overnight... A user logging feature would be better, though -
> some sort of
> utmp-a-like (although it should be in text format). This information should
> not be available
> through the client, though, since it defeats the object of keeping the 'I HAT
> E YOU' response.
Using cvsweb, or a commitinfo script (with e-mail, etc), this can be made
almost to order. I agree that immediate feedback would be nice too. I'd
say that if and only if the user/password stuff are "fine", then you could
complain about a bad CVSROOT...
--Toby.
