I still don't see why your shop doesn't adopt the "cvs edit -c" patch (and
communicate via automated notification and other means).
Noel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 02/12/2000 05:17:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (bcc: Noel L Yap)
Subject: Re: CVS File Locking
Hi David,
>Technicly having solid locks concurrent with concurrency is feasable. I
>think denying them will hurt CVS.
Practically, ignoring the fact that the current locks are in CVS and they
are not working good (and are out of control) is hurting the CVS and
concurency right now. My shop is using CVS with locking, and I see them to
keep like that forever. If the locking is done the right way before CVS 1.11
will come out, then perhaps at least in my next job I will not have to do
the stupid locking over the 'C' files...
BR,
Jerzy
The first thing they don't teach you at school: "Never say never".
All the issues not related to the list please send to me in private, thanks.
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
