Dear Kate Ebneter,
>And as for
>locking, I'm sorry, but what part of CONCURRENT Versioning System don't
>people understand??? If y'all wanna turn it into Control Via
>Synchronization, well, could you please do it to another source code
>control system? Please?
You should listen to your own advice and read the proposals and posts before
you say something about them. As it is easy to show CVS has locks already.
And in the very facist way it kills the concurent model on the spot. We are
debating what to do with locks that are already there to make CVS concurent
FOR REAL. You seem to belong to the ideologically charged group who do not
see the facts, and filter them out... That is blindness, you know? Does the
world 'locks' scare you so much that you can not focus on anything and you
can only scream:
"Don't say that word, don't say that word or the bad ghosts of locking model
will show up!". Well, that bad ghost has already took over, and we want to
move it to it's place...
As for Greg:
>I don't understand the motives of those who attack Greg without really
>understanding what he's saying,
They can't - most of the time Greg only replies to change the tools you
using or to read the paper. That doesn't help to understand him. He can not
make his point without offending people - so he will always be under attack.
BR,
Jerzy
The first thing they don't teach you at school: "Never say never".
All the issues not related to the list please send to me in private, thanks.
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
