[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 02/16/2000 02:29:45 AM
>But that is the problem, each and every developer doesn't know who all the
>other developers are.
They do if they use "cvs edit" and "cvs watch".
>>CVS is not a substitute for management.
>>
>But it is! CVS is supposed to manage a whole lot of files for me, and avoid
>me from keeping av list of which files have been changed when by who for
>what reason.
>And it is not the task of management to know about each and every file the
>developers are working with, thats what they installed CVS for!
Of course CVS manages file versioning. It doesn't, however, handle people
management, team management, project management, ...
>I love copy-edit-merge in 99% of the cases, I would be euforic (is that the
>word?) if CVS could have supported that last 1% in a nice way.
It's euphoric. CVS does if your team agrees to use "cvs edit" with the "cvs
edit -c" patch.
Noel
